“I did then what I knew how to do. Now that I know better, I do better.” - Maya Angelou
People are not static, they make mistakes and then learn from them. This should be remembered when conducting background checks. As our ways of growing and learning improve, so should the ways we evaluate past mistakes for reconciliation. Similarly, background checks must strike a balance between ensuring safety and providing individuals with the opportunity to move beyond their mistakes.
Human and their association with mistakes have been eternal. The issue is not with making mistakes, the issue is to make mistakes and then not learn from them. But what if people are ready to learn from their mistakes and make reconciliations? Don’t they deserve a second chance? Should they always be labelled or judged for their crime?
According to the SHRM Executive Network, to this date, approximately one-third of working-age adults have a criminal history. That means over 70 million people have some sort of criminal history. While discrimination and systemic racism are undoubtedly major factors in the criminal justice system, for many, hiring someone with a criminal record is counter-intuitive.
Anything suspicious on a background check will cause most employers to toss away a resume. Fortunately, many companies have stepped up to offer second-chance employment. It’s an opportunity for people who have a criminal record, but not one that interferes with the job. Millions of people have a few small infractions that can be forgiven if they have repaid society and are trying to live a better life. It often feels good to see someone rebuild their career. However, it’s also important to know exactly what to look for in a background check if you intend to be a second-chance employer.
According to a federal court ruling in 1975, employers can no longer automatically exclude applicants from job consideration based on their criminal history. Since that time, “Ban the Box” laws have come into play, making it illegal in some states to even ask questions about criminal history on an initial job application. With incarceration rates rising exponentially since that time, many employers now need to face the reality that applicants with a criminal record must be considered and in some cases, hired. Understandably, this can all be very confusing for employers. In some cases, employers exercise too much caution, resulting in the needless exclusion of some promising candidates. In other cases, they may go to the other extreme, and show too little caution in the evaluation of candidates’ criminal histories.
Second-chance hiring, when implemented thoughtfully, brings many benefits to employers. For one thing, it can dramatically widen your talent pool. This is no small perk in today’s shrinking labor market in which you often find yourself with very few options from which to choose.
According to statistics, second-chance employers enjoy a more loyal workforce with higher rates of retention. Second-chance employers also get the assurance that they comply with the many “Ban the Box” laws that are popping up everywhere, allowing a nuanced background verification process
Mistakes from the past often cast long shadows, especially when they show up in a background check. Whether it's a criminal record, financial troubles, employment gaps, or educational discrepancies, these past errors can significantly impact an individual’s career opportunities. In a highly competitive job market, such red flags can be the difference between landing a job or facing rejection. However, the way these mistakes are handled during background checks is evolving, with employers increasingly focused on fairness, rehabilitation, and giving second chances.
By evaluating the full context of someone’s past, employers can see beyond the surface and make informed decisions. While background checks are crucial for maintaining a safe, trustworthy workplace, they can also be a platform for showing growth, accountability, and redemption. Let’s explore the impact of common background check findings.
The legal landscape of background checks is evolving; rehabilitation and record clearance offer individuals with past convictions the opportunity to rebuild their lives. Legal provisions like expungement and record sealing enable eligible individuals to have certain criminal records cleared, making it easier for them to reintegrate into society. These frameworks support not just personal rehabilitation but also help open doors to employment.
For employers and background check companies, this creates both an opportunity and a challenge: how to accurately assess rehabilitated records in a background check while remaining compliant with fair hiring laws?
To ensure a balanced approach, background check companies can implement several key strategies:
Imagine standing at a crossroads, where one path leads to stringent safety measures and the other offers the promise of rehabilitation and growth. Many professionals today grapple with this dilemma, especially in the fields of criminal justice and social work. Safety concerns are undeniably critical; after all, statistics show that a significant percentage of society worries about recidivism. But, what if we focused on rehabilitation instead?
Providing opportunities for transformation might not only safeguard society but also reintegrate individuals as productive members. This balance can seem daunting, but can help assess individuals effectively, ensuring that the right support is provided without compromising security. By incorporating the best practices for rehabilitation and second-chance hiring, background check companies, like Check Xperts in Pakistan, can open a new world of opportunities for a broader group of people.